The expulsion of Blessed Geza and Gifford Gomwe is not a forgotten footnote in the Party’s long march; it is a warning flare fired into the night sky. It signals, unmistakably, that indiscipline – especially when amplified through the reckless megaphone of social media – carries consequences in ZANUPF. Their removal was not an attempt to silence thought or debate. It was an act of institutional self-defence, meant to preserve order, hierarchy, and the coherence of the Party’s central brand.
That brand is His Excellency, President Emmerson Dambudzo Mnangagwa.
Every durable political party functions like a solar system: it survives because all bodies orbit a single, stable centre. In ZANUPF, that centre is President Mnangagwa. He is not merely the Head of State; he is the Party’s face, anchor, and reference point. Strategy, messaging, and mobilisation must revolve around him. Self-appointed unaligned spokespeople, freelance ideologues, and online gladiators are not exhibiting initiative; they are drifting into insubordination.
Social media, when properly harnessed, is a useful tool – a transmission belt for the President’s vision and the national interest. When abused, it mutates into shrapnel. Public insults, factional skirmishes, and performative outrage do not remain contained; they ricochet back to His Excellency and smear the Party’s name. In a ruling Party, this behaviour is not a private indulgence; it is a public liability.
ZANUPF is a rules-based organisation, not a street market of emotions. It has structures, procedures, and established channels for resolving grievances. The Party is not governed by WhatsApp voice notes or trending hashtags on X and Facebook. History is unambiguous: those who mistake noise for power eventually collide with the immovable wall of Party discipline. That wall has already claimed its examples of yesteryear.
Leadership demands restraint and control. ZANUPF carries the national mandate; its members are therefore expected to lead with maturity and unity. Borrowing the chaotic, impulsive communication habits of opposition formations is like importing termites into one’s own house; it corrodes the foundations from within and violates the Party’s culture and tradition.
Vision 2030 is the compass. The President’s developmental agenda is the assignment. Anything that diverts energy from it – be it ego-driven theatrics, online exhibitionism, or careless talk – is not activism. It is sabotage disguised as enthusiasm.
Discipline, therefore, is not optional. Loyalty is not decorative. In ZANUPF, the brand is settled, the centre is fixed, and the leader is unquestioned. Everyone else must understand their orbit – and stay within it.
Post a comment